Naming Proofs in Classical Propositional Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a theory of proof denotations in classical propositional logic. The abstract definition is in terms of a semiring of weights, and two concrete instances are explored. With the Boolean semiring we get a theory of classical proof nets, with a geometric correctness criterion, a sequentialization theorem, and a strongly normalizing cut-elimination procedure. This gives us a “Boolean” category, which is not a poset. With the semiring of natural numbers, we obtain a sound semantics for classical logic, in which fewer proofs are identified. Though a “real” sequentialization theorem is missing, these proof nets have a grip on complexity issues. In both cases the cut elimination procedure is closely related to its equivalent in the calculus of structures.
منابع مشابه
Truth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملA Contraction-Free Focused Sequent Calculus for Classical Propositional Logic
Existing focused proof systems for classical and intuitionistic logic allow contraction for exactly those formulas chosen for focus. For proof-search applications, contraction is undesirable, as we risk traversing the same path multiple times. We present here a contraction-free focused sequent calculus for classical propositional logic, called LKFCF, which is a modification of the recently deve...
متن کاملA Semantic View of Classical Proofs: Type-Theoretic, Categorical, and Denotational Characterizations (Preliminary Extended Abstract)
Classical logic is one of the best examples of a mathematical theory that is truly useful to computer science. Hardware and software engineers apply the theory routinely. Yet from a foundational standpoint, there are aspects of classical logic that are problematic. Unlike intuitionistic logic, classical logic is often held to be non-constructive, and so, is said to admit no proof semantics. To ...
متن کاملCombinatorial Proof Semantics
The paper Proofs Without Syntax [Annals of Mathematics, to appear] introduced the notion of a combinatorial proof for classical propositional logic. The present paper uses combinatorial proofs to define a semantics for classical propositional sequent calculus, an inductive translation from sequent proofs to combinatorial proofs. The semantics is abstract and efficient: abstract in the sense tha...
متن کاملHow Many Times Do We Need an Assumption to Prove a Tautology in Minimal Logic: An Example on the Compression Power of Classical Reasoning
In this article we present a class of formulas φn, n ∈ Nat, that need at least 2 assumption occurrences to be proved in a normal proof in Natural Deduction for purely implicational minimal propositional logic. In purely implicational classical propositional logic, with Peirce’s rule, each φn is proved with only one assumption occurrence in Natural Deduction in a normal proof. Besides that, the ...
متن کامل